A study has found that 'behavioural sleep
techniques,' such as leaving a baby to cry for a certain amount of time, does
them no harm.
Many parents instinctively want to rush to their baby’s
side when they hear it crying, but new research suggests they would be better
off leaving it for a bit.
A study of so-called behavioural sleep techniques such as
controlled crying – where the parent waits a certain amount of time before
settling the child - found they had no marked, long-lasting negative
effects.
The risk of the mother suffering post-natal depression
might also be reduced by practising the techniques, it suggested.
Controlled crying has been a popular parenting choice,
with some believing it trains babies to settle into a routine.
The researchers from the University of Melbourne sampled
326 babies who were all at least seven months old and followed them up five
years later to see whether those who had been subjected to sleep interventions
had suffered any long-term harms or benefits.
They
also studied the mother’s experience.
They
concluded: “Parents and health professionals can confidently use these
techniques to reduce the short- to medium-term burden of infant sleep problems
and maternal depression.”
The
scientists carried out their work following concerns that behavioural infant
sleep interventions, although demonstrated to be effective in the short to
medium-term, could ultimately harm children’s emotional development and
subsequent mental health.
Their
findings, published in the journal Pediatrics, appear to contradict those of
another recent study suggesting that babies who are left to cry could feel
“stressed” even after they settle down.
A study has found that 'behavioural sleep
techniques,' such as leaving a baby to cry for a certain amount of time, does
them no harm.
Many parents instinctively want to rush to their baby’s
side when they hear it crying, but new research suggests they would be better
off leaving it for a bit.
A study of so-called behavioural sleep techniques such as
controlled crying – where the parent waits a certain amount of time before
settling the child - found they had no marked, long-lasting negative
The risk of the mother suffering post-natal depression
might also be reduced by practising the techniques, it suggested.
Controlled crying has been a popular parenting choice,
with some believing it trains babies to settle into a routine.
The researchers from the University of Melbourne sampled
326 babies who were all at least seven months old and followed them up five
years later to see whether those who had been subjected to sleep interventions
had suffered any long-term harms or benefits.
They
also studied the mother’s experience.
They
concluded: “Parents and health professionals can confidently use these
techniques to reduce the short- to medium-term burden of infant sleep problems
and maternal depression.”
The
scientists carried out their work following concerns that behavioural infant
sleep interventions, although demonstrated to be effective in the short to
medium-term, could ultimately harm children’s emotional development and
subsequent mental health.
Their
findings, published in the journal Pediatrics, appear to contradict those of
another recent study suggesting that babies who are left to cry could feel
“stressed” even after they settle down.