A study has found that 'behavioural sleep
techniques,' such as leaving a baby to cry for a certain amount of time, does
them no harm.
Many parents instinctively want to rush to their baby’s
side when they hear it crying, but new research suggests they would be better
off leaving it for a bit.
Allowing an infant to settle itself does it no harm and
can in fact enable both the child and the parent to get a better night’s sleep,
scientists said.
A study of so-called behavioural sleep techniques such as
controlled crying – where the parent waits a certain amount of
time before
settling the child - found they had no marked, long-lasting negative effects.
The risk of the mother suffering post-natal depression
might also be reduced by practising the techniques, it suggested.
Controlled crying has been a popular parenting choice,
with some believing it trains babies to settle into a routine.
A parent using the method might leave
their baby to cry for five minutes at first, before going to soothe them.
They would then leave and wait 10 minutes before going in
again, then 20 before the next intervention, and so on.
An alternative method studied by the researchers was
“camping out,” where the parent waits in the baby’s bedroom for it to fall to
sleep.
The researchers from the University of Melbourne sampled
326 babies who were all at least seven months old and followed them up five
years later to see whether those who had been subjected to sleep interventions
had suffered any long-term harms or benefits.
They
also studied the mother’s experience.
They
concluded: “Parents and health professionals can confidently use these
techniques to reduce the short- to medium-term burden of infant sleep problems
and maternal depression.”
The
scientists carried out their work following concerns that behavioural infant
sleep interventions, although demonstrated to be effective in the short to
medium-term, could ultimately harm children’s emotional development and
subsequent mental health.
Their
findings, published in the journal Pediatrics, appear to contradict those of
another recent study suggesting that babies who are left to cry could feel
“stressed” even after they settle down.
time before settling the child - found they had no marked, long-lasting negative effects.
A parent using the method might leave
their baby to cry for five minutes at first, before going to soothe them.
They would then leave and wait 10 minutes before going in
again, then 20 before the next intervention, and so on.
An alternative method studied by the researchers was
“camping out,” where the parent waits in the baby’s bedroom for it to fall to
sleep.
The researchers from the University of Melbourne sampled
326 babies who were all at least seven months old and followed them up five
years later to see whether those who had been subjected to sleep interventions
had suffered any long-term harms or benefits.
They
also studied the mother’s experience.
They
concluded: “Parents and health professionals can confidently use these
techniques to reduce the short- to medium-term burden of infant sleep problems
and maternal depression.”
The
scientists carried out their work following concerns that behavioural infant
sleep interventions, although demonstrated to be effective in the short to
medium-term, could ultimately harm children’s emotional development and
subsequent mental health.
Their
findings, published in the journal Pediatrics, appear to contradict those of
another recent study suggesting that babies who are left to cry could feel
“stressed” even after they settle down.